Legal views 鈥� Page 4
-
CommentNet zero and the Loch Ness monster tax bill
A recent court ruling about a hydroelectric scheme at Loch Ness has implications for government policy on net zero
-
CommentCase in focus: An unusual judgment in a multi-party PFI fire defects dispute
Ted Lowery looks at the recent聽Sheffield Teaching Hospital Foundation Trust vs Hadfield Healthcare Partnerships Ltd & Ors case
-
CommentTemporary finality in adjudication: Why you must pay now, argue later
A case where timing was all 鈥� from the temporary finality of the adjudicator鈥檚 decisions to the interim account dates
-
CommentAssessing the 精东影视 Safety Act's new product safety regime
Does the 精东影视 Safety Act adequately address the聽issues around construction product regulation?
-
CommentA new way to make contracts greener
TLT and TCLP鈥檚 free contracting tool flags climate issues at all stages in the building lifecycle
-
CommentHow to manage long-term illness: a legal guide
What are employers鈥� obligations to workers in relation to long-term sickness or disability?
-
CommentDefective premises ruling likely to lead to increase in claims
Whether developers are owed duties under the Defective Premises Act 鈥� a point long uncertain in the courts 鈥� has been clarified
-
CommentBeware - some things only a聽solicitor can do
A claims consultant got on the wrong side of the law 鈥� risking prison 鈥� by getting a tad too far into the legalities
-
CommentHow can project teams develop and follow through on alliancing contracts?
A new guide helps firms compose a stronger construction alliance, explain Tom Burton and Edd Douglas
-
CommentLegal abroad: Doing business in Vietnam
Our series on operating under foreign jurisdictions examines a promising Asian alternative to China and India
-
CommentA new option for EPCM contracts
The IChemE Blue Book is a new form of contract for project services 鈥� how does it differ from the usual IChemE approach?
-
CommentAn adjudicator should deal with defects disputes, not the New Homes Ombudsman
This New Homes Ombudsman is a notion that鈥檚 all well and good, but its powers should not extend into defects disputes
-
CommentContracting for offsite schemes
Peter Hibberd sets out the JCT standard form options when selecting a contract for a project that will use modern methods of construction
-
CommentEssential law: Termination, part three
As part of our essential law series, Sara Cunningham discusses how a right to terminate can be lost
-
CommentAdjudicator fees: paying the piper ahead of the tune
Adjudicators demand payment up front for good reason 鈥� but it鈥檚 not a lien, as those aren鈥檛 allowed. They should be
-
CommentA knotty nuisance: Japanese knotweed for developers
The legal implications of developing land adjacent to this highly invasive plant may be more extensive than you thought
-
CommentExplaining the infrastructure levy
The proposed new levy, designed to replace section 106 agreements and the CIL, is now to be stuck in pilot phase for a decade. What does this mean for developers?
-
CommentWill the JCT change how its contracts tackle insolvency?
Recent changes to insolvency law bring expectations of an amended approach in the upcoming new contract suite
-
CommentShould your building register as higher-risk?
With the register now open for existing higher-risk buildings in England, principal accountable persons must make sure to register
-
CommentThe developer remediation contract is full of confusion
Almost 50 developers have committed to fire safety remediation works under this government scheme, but clarity is severely lacking