Legal views 鈥� Page 43
-
CommentThis looks good on paper
You don鈥檛 want the sale of your scheme delayed by missing bits of evidence so make sure your development comes complete with a paper trail
-
CommentAnother fine mess
Construction companies face vastly increased fines for breaching environmental law 鈥� so be clear about the legal implications of your activities or you could end up in big trouble
-
CommentAre you being served?
Unless the employer serves its payment or pay less notices, it should expect to pay the amount applied for - irrespective of the true value of the work actually carried out
-
CommentThe change mechanism
In projects where a large number of variations have taken place, should the contractor argue that the entire scheme of work be re-priced?
-
CommentCyber security: Security protocols
The latest PAS document goes beyond BIM to look at wider security concerns in the digital built environment
-
CommentAdjudication: The lay of the land
Does the work you鈥檙e engaged with constitute a 鈥榗onstruction operation鈥�? You had better be clear on this before you enter into adjudication
-
CommentSubrogation: Not so plain sailing
Subrogation and issues of joint insurance often arise when drafting construction contracts. What guidance can a judgment involving a hired boat offer in these areas?
-
CommentAs time goes by
An adjudicator鈥檚 decision is binding until the dispute is finally determined but here鈥檚 a case that opens up the question of limitation and how late that determination can take place
-
CommentExclusivities: Exclusive arrangements
Exclusivity or lock out agreements are becoming increasingly common. But what are the benefits and why are they so popular all of a sudden?
-
CommentOverpayment: Rare need for redress
It should be difficult to overpay on an interim payment but when it does occur, should there be an express term providing for repayment?
-
CommentRight to buy and development
What impact would an extended right to buy have on housing association development programmes?
-
CommentDon鈥檛 stray from the path
Not acting under strict terms of a contract? Beware - it鈥檚 sometimes hard to get back on the straight and narrow
-
CommentHeat Network Regulations: Turning up the heat
Calling all developers, landlords and operators: the Heat Network Regulations are now in force and they bring with them some onerous requirements
-
CommentEeny, meeny, miny, moe
Should you choose arbitration or High Court for your dispute resolution clause? Steep rises in court fees have made the choice trickier
-
CommentNo bargain in this basement
Basement developments can often be a delicate and troublesome procedure. But who鈥檚 at fault if things start to go wrong?
-
CommentCaught in a bind
Our columnist examines a homeowners鈥� dispute where an adjudicator鈥檚 decision was held to be finally binding 鈥� that is what they asked for
-
CommentConstructing a team
At a time when firms are taking on more workers, employers need to be careful of the pitfalls and work to build and maintain a workforce
-
CommentPBAs: Tell it like it is
There鈥檚 still resistance to project bank accounts from main contractors. It鈥檚 time some people got their facts straight
-
CommentDangers in the deep
A recent case shows the risk that design-and-build contractors are exposed to on complex projects such as offshore wind farms
-
CommentStatutory payment provisions: Where are we now?
There is little review over the provisions which have changed the payment regimes in the construction industry