Legal views 鈥� Page 48
-
CommentPrefabrication: Off-site on your mind
Complex projects are increasingly relying on off-site manufacturing to help deliver schemes on time and budget. But a new kind of supply chain creates new kinds of risks
-
CommentPerformance bonds: Don鈥檛 bank on it
Bonds have long been established as part of the contracting process. But there may be advantages to sourcing them from insurance providers rather than banks
-
CommentWhen is a building not a building?
Defining what is a building 鈥� or more specifically a construction operation 鈥� is not as easy as you think
-
CommentThe doctrine of frustration
What effects would the outbreak of war on the international construction market?
-
CommentTurning the light off
Goldman Sachs鈥� proposed headquarters is being hindered by two right to light disputes. But should the City of London Corporation use its powers to override these rights?
-
CommentNew housing standards on the way
National standards are part of the government鈥檚 drive to cut costs, but will there be other consequences?
-
CommentICC form: The Latest Model
A second edition of the ICC form 鈥� aimed at infrastructure projects 鈥� is on the horizon. But how much of an improvement over its predecessor is the consultative edition?
-
CommentLADs: Sharing the pain
Recent cases may prompt employers to increase the liquidated damages they seek from contractors, who in turn may be more inclined to pass them down to subcontractors
-
CommentVariation clauses: At your discretion
Variation clauses allow employers to alter works part way through a project. But they can lead to unfairness if a contractor has to act without waiting for instruction
-
CommentScotland: Another country
Scotland may still be part of the United Kingdom, but the extra devolution promised by all three main parties will have consequences for those contracting north of the border
-
CommentWhen setting-off isn鈥檛 letting off
There are circumstances where the paying party may avoid settling an amount awarded by an adjudicator using set-off
-
CommentConstruction Act: Pay back time
Moves to speed up payment for the supply chain may have tipped the balance too far the other way and some subcontractors are cashing in
-
CommentLiquidated damages: The unlikely LADs
A court struck down a liquidated damages clause because when the value of the contract was reduced, it became disproportionate and 鈥榰nconscionable鈥�
-
CommentCollaborative working: Age of the team players
The industry has a number of tools to help focus collaborative working. So, is partnering still the future of construction?
-
CommentChain of indemnity
A look at a case where an indemnity clause was found to be applicable despite the beneficiary being at fault
-
CommentFor all practical purposes
A case on the familiar topic of a professional鈥檚 duties in certifying practical completion
-
CommentLearning to get ahead of the game
Stereotypical substandard student accommodation is changing
-
CommentRisky business
More than 80% of the industry complain that contract obligations are becoming too complex. But guarding against risk early on could save money
-
CommentPayment abuse: Won鈥檛 pay, must pay
Don鈥檛 underestimate the challenge. It鈥檚 time to beef up the Payment Charter
-
CommentLet鈥檚 talk about it
A High Court decision says parties to a dispute may be obliged to first to enter into friendly discussions