That is the theory, anyway. What seems likely is that the eventual winner鈥檚 authority to use those powers will depend on what happens on election day. 鈥淚t is not just who wins, it is by what majority. That is a critical factor,鈥 says Robert Gordon Clark, broadcaster and managing director of London Communications Agency. 鈥淚f Ken wins with over 50%, he will have a powerful mandate in negotiations with the government.鈥
And not just the government. Among those directly affected by the new order will be developers, construction professionals, and planners, many of whose activities will have to fall into line with the mayor鈥檚 strategic development strategy. And of course, there are the consortia that last week put their bids in to join the 拢7bn public-private partnership that is to run London鈥檚 Tube lines. They have already spent millions on a project that is vehemently opposed by Ken Livingstone, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens 鈥 and even Frank Dobson鈥檚 support is uncertain.
So, what does the construction industry and its clients have to fear or hope for from the mayor? The answer seems to depend on what you do for a living.
Planning and the mayor鈥檚 veto
The development community and the London borough councils are extremely wary of the mayor鈥檚 power of vetoing planning applications 鈥渙f strategic importance鈥. Developers, in particular, fear more of those embarrassing last-minute planning hitches that put foreign firms off building in the capital.
The Corporation of London, the City鈥檚 planning authority, has already successfully lobbied to increase the height beyond which a scheme is designated 鈥渙f strategic importance鈥 from 30 m to 75 m. Stuart Fraser, chairman of the corporation鈥檚 planning and transport committee, takes a no-nonsense stance: 鈥淲hoever becomes mayor will probably leave us alone unless we propose to do something extraordinarily stupid. We hope the mayor for London will have better things to do than mess around with our planning process.鈥
The London boroughs, however, await with apprehension the publication of the mayor鈥檚 spatial development strategy scheduled for July 2001, with which their unitary development plans will have to tally. It has been suggested that developers will avoid confrontations with the mayor by tailoring schemes to come in under the 鈥渟trategic importance鈥 ceilings. This may mean, for example, that we will see housing schemes of 499 units instead of 500, and City office blocks of 74 m instead of 75 m.
But Clark says this may not get developers off the hook: 鈥淚t will be hard to stop the mayor intervening, especially if whoever it is has a large mandate. You may say: 鈥榊ou鈥檝e got no right to call this in because it is outside Nick Raynsford鈥檚 definition of strategic importance in the GLA act.鈥 But the mayor can reply: 鈥楾ough; it鈥檚 in my spatial development strategy.鈥 And they could invoke less quantifiable definitions of 鈥榮trategic views鈥 and the 鈥榠mpact鈥 of developments.鈥
But architects and urban designers will be hoping that the mayor will transform London鈥檚 civic spaces and restore Londoners鈥 pride in their city, as Pasqual Maragall, socialist mayor of Barcelona, did for his city before the 1992 Olympics, or as Rudolph Giuliani has done in New York. 鈥淚t is the most exciting time to be alive in London since the 19th century. It鈥檚 a terrific time for architects and engineers to contribute to reworking the fabric of our city,鈥 says Alan Baxter, senior partner with structural engineer Alan Baxter Associates.
But while many of the mayoral candidates have expressed such aspirations, their first priority has to be tackling crime, sorting out the Tube and traffic congestion and reducing unemployment.
Mayor Livingstone, we presume
The most recent poll shows Livingstone leading with 61% of the vote, Dobson trailing badly on 16%, the Conservative candidate Steve Norris on 13% and Liberal Democrat Susan Kramer on 8%.
It is thought that many people will vote for Livingstone just to have fun watching Red Ken bait the pinky-blue Blairite control freaks at Westminster. However, Livingstone may have to take a more consensual approach to the mayoralty. He will have to work closely with the 25-strong assembly to govern smoothly, as without the assembly鈥檚 support, the mayor would be unable to set a budget. 鈥淎 majority vote against the mayor鈥檚 budget would delay it, and a two-thirds majority would overturn it,鈥 says Tony Travers, director of the Greater London Group at the London School of Economics. 鈥淚t would create a log-jam.鈥
The fear of this aggravation will no doubt cause other voters to steer clear of Livingstone, although many are unmoved by the other candidates. One well-known London-based architect says: 鈥淣one of them has any real weight. Nobody who had anything to lose would stand for mayor because nobody knows if they will be able to get things done or how they will be treated by government.鈥
Many feel that whoever becomes mayor will have their work cut out getting the show on the road, and will have limited opportunity to make their mark once they do. As Baxter says: 鈥淲e may be expecting too much from the mayor and the Greater London Authority. Any major body takes time to work itself out. The real interest is how it works from year four on. The most important thing is to start the GLA off wisely, so as not to inhibit its long-term value for London.鈥
The candidates you may be less familiar with
Dr Geoffrey Clements, Natural Law Party The party believes that society鈥檚 problems are caused by the violation of the laws of nature. Physicist Clements believes in alleviating stress through transcendental meditation and yogic flying. He promises to cut crime with a team of 350 yogic flyers. Ram Gidoomal, Christian Peoples鈥 Alliance Arrived in London in 1967 from Kenya as an Asian refugee. Within six months, he had turned around a struggling newsagent and acquired five more. He went on to run a multinational trading corporation, the Inlaks group, with 7000 staff worldwide. He is campaigning for racial justice, regeneration of deprived boroughs and better job skills training. He would keep the Tube in public hands and finance it by 鈥減eople鈥檚 bonds鈥. Damian Hockney, UK Independence Party The flamboyant Hockney publishes several hair and beauty magazines and has a predilection for plastic surgery. He stood against Michael Portillo in the Kensington & Chelsea by-election under the slogan 鈥淚t takes a real man to defeat the EU鈥. Darren Johnson, Green Paid consultant of Friends of the Earth. He won鈥檛 win, but he is almost certain to be on the assembly. He opposes privatisation of the Tube and has policies to reduce road traffic by 30% from 1997 levels by 2008. He opposes large out-of-town developments with car parking, is in favour of recycling of buildings and has a blue-belt strategy to ensure the Thames does not become lined with luxury apartments. Malcolm McLaren, formerly independent, now Livingstone backer The former Sex Pistols manager pulled out last week, but his plans included legalising brothels, with one next to parliament for MPs. He also wanted Amsterdam-style cannabis-selling coffee houses. He planned to lobby for legislation to bar politicians from running for mayor if elected.What can a mayor actually do?
Term: Four years. Can stand for re-election as many times as he/she likes. Can only be sacked if found guilty of a criminal offence. Constituency: 5 million residents of Greater London Salary: 拢84 384 Budget: 拢5bn. Limited tax-raising powers GLA staff: 25 directly elected assembly members, 400 staff Patronage: Mayor will appoint a deputy from the assembly, two political advisers and 10 members of a mayoral policy unit Transport: Will appoint the 15 board members of Transport for London 鈥 the new body in charge of all transport in the capital Economic development: Will appoint all 15 board members and chief executive of the London Development Agency 鈥 the body in charge of inward investment, regeneration, improved skills training and employment Planning: Mayor will draw up a spatial development strategy for London by July 2001. He or she will be consulted on planning applications of strategic importance (expected to be up to 250 a year). Mayor will not be able to delay the taking of a decision by the local planning authority, but will have a further 14 days after it has reached a view to use powers of veto Planning applications of strategic importance include:- very large new buildings (more than 30 000 m2 in the City of London, 20 000 m2 in the rest of central London)
- tall new buildings (above 25 m fronting the Thames, 75 m in the City of London and 30 m in other areas)
- residential schemes above 500 units or 10 ha
- mining operations (sites of more than 10 ha)
- large new waste facilities (more than 50 000 tonnes capacity)
- new transport facilities, such as air terminals, heliports, coach stations and Thames bridges
- loss of housing (more than 200 units) or designated housing land (more than 4 ha)
- loss of land (more than 4 ha) in use or designated for employment purposes
- loss of land (more than 2 ha) in use or designated as a playing field
- development of more than 1000 m2 in the green belt or on designated metropolitan open land. Q development affecting a designated strategic view