All Adjudications articles
-
CommentCase in focus:聽Payless notices
An effective payless notice must include an explanation of the grounds for withholding, a headline figure and a calculation showing how that figure has been produced
-
CommentCase in focus:聽Adjudication relief
Having abandoned the first adjudication, was the referring party acting unreasonably and oppressively in seeking to bring similar claims in a second adjudication?
-
CommentConstruction Act: Super size me
When parliament served up adjudication in the Construction Act, it intended it to be a fast, cheap way of sorting out a dispute. But it鈥檚 turned into something much bigger than that.
-
CommentPick your battles: Adjudication when a party is in administration
Taking part in an adjudication will always be a risk 鈥� but even more so when one of the parties is in administration. We look at the issues you should consider
-
精东影视Speymill Contracts vs Eric Baskind: The allegation of fraud in adjudication
Following recent cases in the Technology & Construction Court, the Court of Appeal has now confirmed how parties should proceed when allegations of fraud are raised during the adjudication or enforcement process
-
精东影视
Rok 精东影视 vs Celtic Composting Systems
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a dispute over the 'slip rule'
-
精东影视Amec Group vs Thames Water: Adjudication deadlines
This case deals with the question of whether an adjudicator should be expected to deal with additional material at the expense of the time limit
-
精东影视Enterprise vs Tony McFadden: Insolvency
Our Fenwick Elliott expert describes a dispute on a pipe repair and maintenance contract
-
精东影视Camillin Denny vs Adelaide Jones: Novation and adjudicator bias
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a dispute on a project in Mayfair
-
精东影视Fenice vs Jerram Falkus: Withholding notices
Our Fenwick Elliott expert reviews a dispute over residential and commercial properties in north London
-
精东影视Adonis vs O'Keefe: Was there a contract?
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses whether the acceptance of an order or letter of intent constitutes a contract
-
精东影视Makers UK vs London Borough of Camden: Case management power
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a pair of interlinked adjudications
-
精东影视Allied vs Paradigm Housing: Was the dispute crystallised?
Our legal expert discussed a dispute over payment between a housebuilder and contractor
-
精东影视Nirah Holdings vs British Agricultural Services and Hanson 精东影视 Products: Section 106
Our Fenwick Elliott expert mulls over a Section 106 agreement dispute
-
精东影视JPA Design & Build vs Sentosa (UK): Setting off damages
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a dispute over the design and construction of a medical centre
-
精东影视S G Hart vs the Smiths: Adjudication claims
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses whether it is possible to set off liquidates damages against a previous adjudication
-
精东影视A different dispute?: Barr vs Klin Investment UK
The factsBarr (鈥淏arr鈥�) entered into a construction contract with Klin Investment UK (鈥淜lin鈥�) for the design and construction of a number of flats in Kilmarnock on 21 February 2005 (the 鈥淐ontract鈥�). The contract was a construction contract within the meaning of sections 104 and 105 of the Housing Grants, Construction ...
-
精东影视Disputes in the UAE: Arbitration options
With the number of construction disputes set to double in Dubai this year, Francis Ho guides you through the local options for those who wish to arbitrate their disputes
-
精东影视HS Works vs Enterprise Managed Services: Multiple adjudications
Our Fenwick Elliott expert discusses a case involving two different adjudications and two different adjudicators
-
Comment
Secrets and lies: Aukett Fitzroy Robinson's fraudulent misrepresentation
A court has found architect Aukett Fitzroy Robinson guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation for failing to inform its client that a team member had quit