Thank you for your recent article entitled 鈥淯S to revise LEED assessment system鈥� (16 May, page 14).

I am writing to address several statements that warrant correction. You said buildings are 鈥渁ble to get a platinum rating without even considering energy鈥�, which is inconsistent with current requirements and practice. A study by the New 精东影视s Institute found LEED 鈥減latinum鈥� buildings earn more than nine out of 10 energy performance points under the system. Furthermore, gold and platinum buildings save more than 45% more energy than standard buildings. New buildings certified under LEED, on average, perform 25-30% better than non-LEED certified ones. The BRE report cited referred to a previous version of the LEED rating system.

The rapidly changing nature of the green building marketplace means it is challenging to remain abreast of changes, but your commitment to clarifying information would help make certain other sources are referring to accurate information.

Topics